HowManyFPS Desktop App v1.25.3Track Bottlenecks and Boost Your FPSOpen HowManyFPS.com on your PC to benchmark

CPU Comparison: FPS, Specs & Value

FX-4350 vs Core Ultra 9 285K

The FX-4350 is much slower than the Core Ultra 9 285K on average across 100+ games. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $460.88 cheaper!

bar_chartBenchmarks groupCommunity calculateFPS Calculator compressBottleneck Calculator

CPU

$78.12View CPUAll CPUs

CPU

$539.00View CPUAll CPUs

Up to 340% faster on average across 100+ games
Is 11 years and 8 months newer
Available for $539.00

FPS Comparison Across Popular Games

Predicted average FPS at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, based on real game benchmarks.

Resolution

Quality

Paired GPU

View Compare All GPUs

Select GPU

Escape From Tarkov2017

FX-4350

208FPS

Core Ultra 9 285K

270FPS

Fortnite2017

FX-4350

332FPS

Core Ultra 9 285K

316FPS

League of Legends2009

FX-4350

112FPS

Core Ultra 9 285K

439FPS

Grand Theft Auto V2013

FX-4350

182FPS

Core Ultra 9 285K

226FPS

Valorant2020

FX-4350

538FPS

Core Ultra 9 285K

822FPS

Overwatch 22023

530FPS

580FPS

338FPS

770FPS

Minecraft2011

FX-4350

577FPS

Core Ultra 9 285K

861FPS

Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Side-by-side specs, synthetic benchmarks, and key hardware differences.

Scorehelp

FX-4350

Core Ultra 9 285K

75%

Core Ultra 9 285K ranks 71 points higher.

Coreshelp

FX-4350

Core Ultra 9 285K

Core Ultra 9 285K has 20 more cores.

Threadshelp

FX-4350

Core Ultra 9 285K

Core Ultra 9 285K has 20 more threads.

L3 Cachehelp

FX-4350

8 MB

Core Ultra 9 285K

36 MB

Core Ultra 9 285K has 28 MB more L3 cache.

Base Frequencyhelp

FX-4350

4.2 GHz

Core Ultra 9 285K

3.7 GHz

FX-4350 has a 14% higher base clock.

Turbo Frequencyhelp

FX-4350

4.3 GHz

Core Ultra 9 285K

5.7 GHz

Core Ultra 9 285K boosts 33% higher.

TDPhelp

FX-4350

125W

Core Ultra 9 285K

125W

Pricehelp

FX-4350

$78.12

Core Ultra 9 285K

$539.00

FX-4350 is $460.88 cheaper.

FX-4350Core Ultra 9 285K

AM3+

Sockethelp

LGA1851

Vishera

Codenamehelp

Arrow Lake-S

Desktop

Segmenthelp

Desktop

On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Integrated GPUhelp

Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU

1866 MHz (DDR3)

RAMhelp

6400 MHz (DDR5)

Not Overclockable

Overclock Supporthelp

Overclockable

Frequently Asked Questions

compare_arrowsWhich is better, FX-4350 or Core Ultra 9 285K?expand_more

The Core Ultra 9 285K. It's 1775% faster than the FX-4350 on average across 100+ games, scoring 75/100 vs 4/100 in our gaming rating.

speedHow much faster is Core Ultra 9 285K than FX-4350?expand_more

1775% faster on average. The gap varies by game and resolution, check the per-game FPS comparison above.

aspect_ratioWhich is better for 1440p and 4K gaming, FX-4350 or Core Ultra 9 285K?expand_more

The Core Ultra 9 285K is faster at both resolutions. Toggle the resolution selector above to see per-game FPS.

paidIs the Core Ultra 9 285K worth buying in 2026?expand_more

It scores 75/100 in our gaming rating, faster than most CPUs on the market. Good buy if the price is right.

differenceWhat is the difference between FX-4350 and Core Ultra 9 285K?expand_more

Performance: FX-4350 scores 4/100, Core Ultra 9 285K scores 75/100. They also differ in core count, clock speeds, L3 cache, and power draw. Full breakdown in the specs section above.

compressWill the FX-4350 or Core Ultra 9 285K bottleneck my PC?expand_more

Depends on the rest of your build, especially your GPU. Swap the paired GPU in the FPS section above to see if it limits performance, or use our bottleneck calculator for a full analysis.

upgradeIs it worth upgrading to the FX-4350 or Core Ultra 9 285K?expand_more

The Core Ultra 9 285K is the stronger pick at 75/100. Compare your current CPU against it to see the exact FPS gain across 100+ games.