Overwatch 2
1080p@180Hz·42:41 played
Henni·20h ago
Public2 Tips
159
FPSAverage
70
FPS1% Low
94%/65°C
69%/52°C
16 GB
73%usage
Xeon Platinum 8180M vs Core Ultra 9 285K
The Xeon Platinum 8180M is much slower than the Core Ultra 9 285K on average across 100+ games. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core Ultra 9 285K74% Score
- Up to 179% faster on average across 100+ games
- Is 7 years and 5 months newer
- Available for $539.00
FPS Comparison Across Popular Games
Predicted average FPS at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, based on real game benchmarks.
Specs & Benchmark Comparison
Side-by-side specs, synthetic benchmarks, and key hardware differences.
L3 Cachehelp
Xeon Platinum 8180M has 2.5 MB more L3 cache.
Base Frequencyhelp
Core Ultra 9 285K has a 48% higher base clock.
Turbo Frequencyhelp
Core Ultra 9 285K boosts 50% higher.
LGA3647
Sockethelp
LGA1851Skylake-SP
Codenamehelp
Arrow Lake-SServer/Workstation
Segmenthelp
DesktopNo Integrated Graphics
Integrated GPUhelp
Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EUDDR4
RAMhelp
6400 MHz (DDR5)Not Overclockable
Overclock Supporthelp
OverclockableFrequently Asked Questions
compare_arrowsWhich is better, Xeon Platinum 8180M or Core Ultra 9 285K?expand_more
The Core Ultra 9 285K. It's 289% faster than the Xeon Platinum 8180M on average across 100+ games, scoring 74/100 vs 19/100 in our gaming rating.
speedHow much faster is Core Ultra 9 285K than Xeon Platinum 8180M?expand_more
289% faster on average. The gap varies by game and resolution, check the per-game FPS comparison above.
aspect_ratioWhich is better for 1440p and 4K gaming, Xeon Platinum 8180M or Core Ultra 9 285K?expand_more
The Core Ultra 9 285K is faster at both resolutions. Toggle the resolution selector above to see per-game FPS.
paidIs the Core Ultra 9 285K worth buying in 2026?expand_more
It scores 74/100 in our gaming rating, faster than most CPUs on the market. Good buy if the price is right.
differenceWhat is the difference between Xeon Platinum 8180M and Core Ultra 9 285K?expand_more
Performance: Xeon Platinum 8180M scores 19/100, Core Ultra 9 285K scores 74/100. They also differ in core count, clock speeds, L3 cache, and power draw. Full breakdown in the specs section above.
compressWill the Xeon Platinum 8180M or Core Ultra 9 285K bottleneck my PC?expand_more
Depends on the rest of your build, especially your GPU. Swap the paired GPU in the FPS section above to see if it limits performance, or use our bottleneck calculator for a full analysis.
upgradeIs it worth upgrading to the Xeon Platinum 8180M or Core Ultra 9 285K?expand_more
The Core Ultra 9 285K is the stronger pick at 74/100. Compare your current CPU against it to see the exact FPS gain across 100+ games.
Popular Comparisons
Xeon Platinum 8180M vs Ryzen 7 7800X3DXeon Platinum 8180M vs Ryzen 7 9700XXeon Platinum 8180M vs Ryzen 7 7700XXeon Platinum 8180M vs Ryzen 9 9900XXeon Platinum 8180M vs Ryzen 5 5500Xeon Platinum 8180M vs Ultra 7 265KFXeon Platinum 8180M vs Ryzen 7 9850X3DXeon Platinum 8180M vs Ryzen 5 7600XXeon Platinum 8180M vs Ultra 5 245KXeon Platinum 8180M vs Ultra 7 270K PlusXeon Platinum 8180M vs Ultra 5 245KFXeon Platinum 8180M vs Ryzen 5 8500GXeon Platinum 8180M vs Ryzen 5 4500Xeon Platinum 8180M vs i3-12100FXeon Platinum 8180M vs Ryzen 5 7500X3DXeon Platinum 8180M vs i5-4590Xeon Platinum 8180M vs i5-4590SXeon Platinum 8180M vs i5-4670Xeon Platinum 8180M vs Ryzen 5 3500XXeon Platinum 8180M vs Ryzen 5 5600Ultra 9 285K vs Ryzen 7 7800X3DUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 7 9700XUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 7 7700XUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 9 9900XUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 5 5500Ultra 9 285K vs Ultra 7 265KFUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 7 9850X3DUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 5 7600XUltra 9 285K vs Ultra 5 245KUltra 9 285K vs Ultra 7 270K PlusUltra 9 285K vs Ultra 5 245KFUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 5 8500GUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 5 4500Ultra 9 285K vs i3-12100FUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 5 7500X3DUltra 9 285K vs i5-4590Ultra 9 285K vs i5-4590SUltra 9 285K vs i5-4670Ultra 9 285K vs Ryzen 5 3500XUltra 9 285K vs Ryzen 5 5600