HowManyFPS Desktop App v1.25.3Track Bottlenecks and Boost Your FPSOpen HowManyFPS.com on your PC to benchmark

CPU Comparison: FPS, Specs & Value

Core i7-620M vs Core Ultra 7 265

The Core i7-620M is much slower than the Core Ultra 7 265 on average across 100+ games. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.

bar_chartBenchmarks groupCommunity calculateFPS Calculator compressBottleneck Calculator

CPU

View All CPUs

Up to 19% cheaper – $332 vs $374.99

CPU

$374.99View CPUAll CPUs

Up to 340% faster on average across 100+ games
Is 15 years and 3 months newer
Up to 271% better value for money
Up to 19% more expensive – $374.99 vs $332

FPS Comparison Across Popular Games

Predicted average FPS at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, based on real game benchmarks.

Resolution

Quality

Paired GPU

View Compare All GPUs

Select GPU

Grand Theft Auto V2013

Core i7-620M

183FPS

Core Ultra 7 265

221FPS

League of Legends2009

116FPS

367FPS

350FPS

704FPS

Escape From Tarkov2017

Core i7-620M

208FPS

Core Ultra 7 265

253FPS

Valorant2020

Core i7-620M

538FPS

Core Ultra 7 265

741FPS

Minecraft2011

Core i7-620M

576FPS

Core Ultra 7 265

776FPS

Dota 22013

Core i7-620M

169FPS

Core Ultra 7 265

271FPS

Call of Duty: Warzone 2.02020

Core i7-620M

250FPS

Core Ultra 7 265

244FPS

Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Side-by-side specs, synthetic benchmarks, and key hardware differences.

Scorehelp

Core i7-620M

Core Ultra 7 265

60%

Core Ultra 7 265 ranks 53 points higher.

Coreshelp

Core i7-620M

Core Ultra 7 265

Core Ultra 7 265 has 18 more cores.

Threadshelp

Core i7-620M

Core Ultra 7 265

Core Ultra 7 265 has 16 more threads.

L3 Cachehelp

Core i7-620M

4 MB

Core Ultra 7 265

30 MB

Core Ultra 7 265 has 26 MB more L3 cache.

Base Frequencyhelp

Core i7-620M

2.677 GHz

Core Ultra 7 265

2.4 GHz

Core i7-620M has a 12% higher base clock.

Turbo Frequencyhelp

Core i7-620M

3.333 GHz

Core Ultra 7 265

5.3 GHz

Core Ultra 7 265 boosts 59% higher.

TDPhelp

Core i7-620M

35W

Core Ultra 7 265

65W

Core i7-620M draws 30W less power.

Pricehelp

Core i7-620M

Core Ultra 7 265

$374.99

Core i7-620MCore Ultra 7 265

Intel BGA 1288

Sockethelp

LGA1851

Arrandale

Codenamehelp

Arrow Lake-S

Mobile

Segmenthelp

Desktop

HD Graphics (Ironlake)

Integrated GPUhelp

Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 32EU

1066 MHz (DDR3)

RAMhelp

6400 MHz (DDR5)

Not Overclockable

Overclock Supporthelp

Not Overclockable

Frequently Asked Questions

compare_arrowsWhich is better, Core i7-620M or Core Ultra 7 265?expand_more

The Core Ultra 7 265. It's 786% faster than the Core i7-620M on average across 100+ games, scoring 62/100 vs 7/100 in our gaming rating.

speedHow much faster is Core Ultra 7 265 than Core i7-620M?expand_more

786% faster on average. The gap varies by game and resolution, check the per-game FPS comparison above.

aspect_ratioWhich is better for 1440p and 4K gaming, Core i7-620M or Core Ultra 7 265?expand_more

The Core Ultra 7 265 is faster at both resolutions. Toggle the resolution selector above to see per-game FPS.

paidIs the Core Ultra 7 265 worth buying in 2026?expand_more

It scores 62/100 in our gaming rating, faster than most CPUs on the market. Good buy if the price is right.

differenceWhat is the difference between Core i7-620M and Core Ultra 7 265?expand_more

Performance: Core i7-620M scores 7/100, Core Ultra 7 265 scores 62/100. They also differ in core count, clock speeds, L3 cache, and power draw. Full breakdown in the specs section above.

compressWill the Core i7-620M or Core Ultra 7 265 bottleneck my PC?expand_more

Depends on the rest of your build, especially your GPU. Swap the paired GPU in the FPS section above to see if it limits performance, or use our bottleneck calculator for a full analysis.

upgradeIs it worth upgrading to the Core i7-620M or Core Ultra 7 265?expand_more

The Core Ultra 7 265 is the stronger pick at 62/100. Compare your current CPU against it to see the exact FPS gain across 100+ games.